On 2/6/2025 5:12 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 4.02.2025 6:33 PM, Taniya Das wrote:
On 2/3/2025 7:44 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 19.01.2025 1:00 PM, Taniya Das wrote:
Add support for video, camera, display and gpu clock controller nodes
for QCS615 platform.
Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
index f4abfad474ea62dea13d05eb874530947e1e8d3e..9d537019437c5202c4d398eecd0ce2a991083175 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi
@@ -3,7 +3,11 @@
* Copyright (c) 2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
*/
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-camcc.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-dispcc.h>
#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-gcc.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-gpucc.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,qcs615-videocc.h>
#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
#include <dt-bindings/dma/qcom-gpi.h>
#include <dt-bindings/interconnect/qcom,icc.h>
@@ -1418,6 +1422,18 @@ data-pins {
};
};
+ gpucc: clock-controller@5090000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,qcs615-gpucc";
+ reg = <0 0x05090000 0 0x9000>;
+
+ clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GPLL0>;
This would normally be GCC_GPU_GPLL0_(DIV_)CLK_SRC, is this intentional?
Yes, Konard, but on QCS615 GPLL0 is connected and not the GCC_GPU_GPLL0 sources.
It looks like you're right.. if I'm looking in the right place, the _GPU_ ones
are not connected anywhere..
It also seems like the reset state of the _GPU_ ones is OFF (as expected),
should we remove them from the GCC driver to reduce confusion?
Yeah I understand it might confuse, but I would like to keep them as the
code will match the clocks present in the hardware.
Konrad
