Hi Felipe, > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 6:06 PM > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 01:17:44AM +0100, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > > > Since the DT should describe the hardware (not the driver limitation), > > > > This patch revises the binding document about the dma-names to change > > > > simple numbering as "ch%d" instead of "tx<n>" and "rx<n>". > > > > > > The naming given in this patch looks more sensible to me. > > > > Thank you for your comment! > > > > > > Also this patch fixes the actual code of renesas_usbhs driver to handle > > > > the new dma-names. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > This patch is based on Felipe's usb.bit / testing/next branch. > > > > (commit id = bbc78c07a51f6fd29c227b1220a9016e585358ba) > > > > > > I take it the existing driver and binding haven't hit mainline, and > > > therefore there are no users yet? > > > > That's correct. At the moment, nobody uses the dma-names in the node of > > renesas_usbhs yet. > > Given that: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> Would you apply this patch to your repository? (If possible, it is merged in your fixes branch because the commit ab330cf388 is already merged on v4.1-rc1 and this patch is related to the commit.) Or, should I resubmit this patch with Mark and Geert's Acked-by? (I confirmed that this patch could be applied on the branches of both fixes and testing/next.) Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda P.S. I am surprised, the Morimoto-san's patch "tidyup usbhs_for_each_dfifo macro" is threaded to this patch. However, this patch is not related to the Morimoto-san's patch. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.sh.devel/45229/focus=124680 > Thanks, > Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
