Hello Chen,
I was tempted to apply this patch while reading throug it until nearly
the end ...
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 03:01:13PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
> [...]
> +static int pwm_sg2042_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> [...]
> + rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared_deasserted(dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(rst))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rst), "Failed to get reset\n");
> +
> + chip->ops = &pwm_sg2042_ops;
> + chip->atomic = true;
> +
> + ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + reset_control_assert(rst);
This is wrong (well, or unneeded). With
devm_reset_control_get_optional_shared_deasserted() the devm cleanup
cares for reasserting the reset.
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register PWM chip\n");
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
If you want I can apply and squash the following in:
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
index ce8cf8af3402..ff4639d849ce 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sophgo-sg2042.c
@@ -174,10 +174,8 @@ static int pwm_sg2042_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
chip->atomic = true;
ret = devm_pwmchip_add(dev, chip);
- if (ret < 0) {
- reset_control_assert(rst);
+ if (ret < 0)
return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to register PWM chip\n");
- }
return 0;
}
ack?
Best regards
Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
