On Tue, 2025-02-04 at 13:40 -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote: > > This one needs an ack from Linus W or Bartosz if I'm to take it. > > However, it's also causing some grief from Rob's bot: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/173859694889.2601726.10618336219726193824.robh@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > As the reported nodes should all be hogs the name shouldn't matter > > anywhere else (as far as I'm aware). It would be nice if all the > > warnings were cleaned up before we merged the binding update. That way > > we don't cause everyone else looking at the CHECK_DTBS=y output more > > grief than they already get for the Aspeed devicetrees. > > > > In order to not get bogged down it might be worth splitting out both > > the IPMB- and GPIO- related patches like you did the FTGMAC100 patch, > > and then I can merge what remains (from a quick look they seem > > relatively uncontroversial). > > > > The warnings are fixed by different patch by Krzysztof. As there are no > more changes then I will wait for other responses. If I don't get those > response in couple of days then I will split it. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20250116085947.87241-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/ That patch fixes a couple of Marvell systems. I think you might have meant this: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250116090009.87338-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/ In which case, I've applied it. Thanks, Andrew
