On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 08:38:56PM +0530, Vikash Garodia wrote: > On 2/4/2025 3:01 PM, Johan Hovold wrote: > > And we're still waiting to hear the answers to all of Hans' questions. I > > still haven't seen anyone explaining why any of this is needed. You > > could have just continued letting Venus support 8250 so presumably there > > is some benefit in using Iris instead. Which? And is that potential > > benefit important enough to not just wait until Iris is up to par > > feature wise? > They are documented in this RFC [1] as comments, and would be added in v10 as we > conclude the ongoing discussion to handle 2 drivers during the transition phase. Ah, I forgot about the comment. Most of that should probably go in the cover letter and commit messages of v10 instead (and with a more condensed comment in the code), but it does indeed seem to provide some answers. > [1] > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20250128080429.3911091-2-quic_dikshita@xxxxxxxxxxx/ Johan
