Hi Rob, > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 03 February 2025 21:06 > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: base: Add of_get_available_child_by_name() > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 11:17 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > +Cc relevant subsystems. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: 03 February 2025 16:53 > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] of: base: Add > > > of_get_available_child_by_name() > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 3:31 AM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > There are lot of drivers using of_get_child_by_name() followed by > > > > of_device_is_available() to find the available child node by name > > > > for a given parent. Provide a helper for these users to simplify the code. > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > --- > > > > v1->v2: > > > > * Updated commit description. > > > > * Updated kerneldoc comment block > > > > * Avoided code duplication by using of_get_child_by_name(). > > > > > > > > Note: > > > > grep showed the below files will be the users for this new API. > > > > I will be updating these drivers once this patch is in mainline. > > > > > > No need to wait. Please convert all the net ones and send this patch with them. > > > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > > Subsequently, I have send the patches. However, Andrew[1]/Krystoff[2] > > mentioned me to wait till this patch appear in -rc , > > > > Can it be fast tracked to 6.14-rcX?? Otherwise, it needs to wait till > > 6.15-rc1 and other patches will then appear on 6.16-rc1. > > Most maintainer trees are based on rc1. So are you sure everyone is going to be fine with a rc2 > dependency? Generally, new APIs don't go in without a user.
