Hi Jayesh, On 24/01/25 13:50, Jayesh Choudhary wrote: <snip> >> compatible: >> enum: >> - ti,am625-dss >> - ti,am62a7,dss >> + - ti,am62l,dss > > > s/ti,am62l,dss/ti,am62l-dss > > There seems to be inconsistency in the usage of the compatible name in > the conditional below. > > Same is with the compatible "ti,am62a7,dss". > Can you fix that too? > > > With the above comments addressed, > > Reviewed-by: Jayesh Choudhary <j-choudhary@xxxxxx> > Thanks for the comments, indeed above needs to be fixed, will include it in V2. Regards Devarsh
