> -----Original Message----- > From: Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Saturday, November 2, 2024 12:12 AM > To: lee@xxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; joel@xxxxxxxxx; andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx; Ryan Chen > <ryan_chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v6 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for > AST2700 > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 17:01:51 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote: > > Add reset, clk dt bindings headers, and update compatible support for > > AST2700 clk, silicon-id in yaml. > > > > > > Applied, thanks! > > [1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed: support for AST2700 > commit: 76c6217c31266e800b67a476bba59dfeb9858a90 > > -- > Lee Jones [李琼斯] Hello, Since this patch have been applied, if I still want modify I will do the rebase and still patch base on this. Am I right? For example I want to modify include/dt-bindings/clock/aspeed,ast2700-scu.h I send the patchv8 [1/3] patch for aspeed,ast2700-scu.h Others [2/3], [3/3] still progress, am I right? Or I should go for new patch series? Ryan
