Hi Gigi,
> btwilink binds bluetooth hci0 interface with the shared transport driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Gigi Joseph <gigi.joseph@xxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/btwilink.txt | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/btwilink.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/btwilink.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/btwilink.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..d286aea
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/btwilink.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +btwilink
> +--------
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> + - compatible : must be "ti,btwilink"
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +Enable the btwilink driver to bind the bluetooth hci0 interface with
> +ti-st shared transport driver
> +
> +btwilink {
> + compatible = "ti,btwilink";
> +};
actually I wonder if someone finally starts re-writing the TI-ST driver to integrate with the new Bluetooth subsystem features (like hdev->setup, __hci_cmd_sync and h4_recv_buf) so that this complicated setup is no longer needed.
I do not think we actually would need a shared transport at all. We should have a Bluetooth HCI driver that can have children for FM radio and GPS exposed. Exposing proper platform devices with Bluetooth HCI as parent makes sense. The shared transport is not really a parent. First and foremost, this is a Bluetooth chip. The FM radio and GPS features are just glued on top of it.
Regards
Marcel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
