On 28/01/2025 10:29, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote: > On 1/28/2025 2:47 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 28/01/2025 10:10, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote: >>> Add device-tree bindings for the ATH12K module found in the IPQ5332 >>> device. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> .../net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-ahb.yaml | 317 ++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 317 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath12k-ahb.yaml >> >> It was v4, now v1? So entire previous discussion and feedback is >> missing? Go to previous series and implement entire feedback. Then use >> proper versioning, proper changelog and make it obvious/understandable >> to us, instead of sending v1 after v4 in entirely separate thread. >> > > I was asked to send DTS as a separate series, this is a new series for > DTS hence stated with v1. But we do not talk about DTS here, but bindings. > To address the undocumented ABIs we have changes in dt-binding and hence That's v1 so how it could have changes in the first place? Unless this is v5? > corresponding changes in driver as well. Let me know If we could send the > complete series as v5. > >> I also do not understand why this is sent to arm soc. That's wireless patch. >> > > All the email list are as per - './scripts/get_maintainer.pl' I am asking why this patch is part of the arm soc patchset. This is networking/wireless patch. Best regards, Krzysztof
