On 15/01/2025 18:19, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi, > > On 15/01/2025 10:40, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>>> Why only these folks? Why not all of the maintainers? >>> >>> The whole series is sent to the media list and maintainers. I thought >>> this single patch doesn't warrant sending the whole series to DT list >>> and maintainers, so I cc'd them here. >> >> >> I was wondering why only some of the DT maintainers, not all? My usual >> assumption is: you are not using get_maintainers.pl or you are working >> on an old kernel. > > It's simpler than that: a copy-paste mistake. I'm not sure how I managed > to miss Conor there. > > Any preference on cc'ing the DT maintainers and the dt-list only for > this patch (I'll use --- this time, I promise!), or just sending the > whole series also to DT people? I think only Rob uses DT list entirely. I use both - DT list and being directly CC-ed on emails, and I think Conor relies on being Cc-ed directly. IOW, just cc all maintainers + DT list. Unless you touch multiple subsystems, there is rarely a point to strip get_maintainers.pl output from maintainers/reviewers/submitters. Do not confuse in skipping non-maintainers pointed by Git-fallback (not applicable to b4, I think), because these should be used carefully. Best regards, Krzysztof
