On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 09:45:50AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 04:01:37PM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote: > > Allow parsing GPIO controller children nodes with GPIO hogs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/aspeed,ast2400-gpio.yaml | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/aspeed,ast2400-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/aspeed,ast2400-gpio.yaml > > index b9afd07a9d24..b9bc4fe4d5a6 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/aspeed,ast2400-gpio.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/aspeed,ast2400-gpio.yaml > > @@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ properties: > > minimum: 12 > > maximum: 232 > > > > +patternProperties: > > + "^(hog-[0-9]+|.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?)$": > > Choose one - suffix or prefix. More popular is suffix. I was about to say that, but this matches what gpio-hog.yaml defines. Why we did both, I don't remember. We could probably eliminate 'hog-[0-9]+' as that doesn't appear to be used much. Long term, I want to make all gpio controllers reference a gpio controller schema and put the hog stuff there. Then we have the node names defined in 1 place. Rob
