On 14/01/2025 11:00, Dario Binacchi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 10:48 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 14/01/2025 10:36, Dario Binacchi wrote: >>>> Nothing improved here. >>> >>> In my humble opinion, there is nothing to improve. Any modification >>> made causes the tests to fail. >>> >>> $ git grep st,stm32f746-rcc arch/ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f746.dtsi: compatible = >>> "st,stm32f746-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc"; >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/st/stm32f769-disco.dts: compatible = >>> "st,stm32f769-rcc", "st,stm32f746-rcc", "st,stm32-rcc"; >>> >>> Or am I missing something? >> >> How can I know what you are missing if you do not show the code? > > Sorry, but I still can't understand. I run multiple tests, trying to You don't understand that I cannot improve your code if I do not see the code? So let me rephrase: In order to tell what is wrong with some sort of code, I need to see it. I cannot tell what is wrong with code without seeing it. > modify things > based on what I understood of your suggestions, but the tests failed > every time. > > Could you kindly provide an example of what you'd like me to do? Any qcom binding? Any other SoC binding with multiple devices? Best regards, Krzysztof