On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 at 09:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 04:03:10PM +0800, Yongxing Mou wrote: > > +patternProperties: > > + "^display-controller@[0-9a-f]+$": > > + type: object > > + additionalProperties: true > > + > > + properties: > > + compatible: > > + items: > > + - const: qcom,qcs8300-dpu > > + - const: qcom,sa8775p-dpu > > + > > + "^displayport-controller@[0-9a-f]+$": > > + type: object > > + additionalProperties: true > > + > > + properties: > > + compatible: > > + items: > > + - const: qcom,qcs8300-dp > > + - const: qcom,sm8650-dp > > Parts of qcs8300 display are compatible with sa8775p, other parts with > sm8650. That's odd or even not correct. Assuming it is actually correct, > it deserves explanation in commit msg. It seems to be correct. These are two different IP blocks with different modifications. QCS8300's DP configuration matches the SM8650 ([1]), though the DPU is the same as the one on the SA8775P platform. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/411626da-7563-48fb-ac7c-94f06e73e4b8@xxxxxxxxxxx/ -- With best wishes Dmitry
