On 2025-01-14 16:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 05:15:39PM +0800, Yijie Yang wrote:
The qcs615-ride utilizes the same EMAC as the qcs404, rather than the
sm8150.
The current fallback could lead to package loss, and the ethernet on
Packet? Package?
I made an error in word usage, and I will correct it.
qcs615-ride was not utilized by anyone.
I don't get how this part of sentence is connected to previous part. I
see the "and" but what do you want to say here? Packages with qcs615
board were lost, therefore the ethernet was not used by anyone? Or
packets could be lost and this means ethernet cannot be used?
The word 'and' represents two independent facts without implying a
logical relationship between them. The two facts correspondingly lead to
the two conclusions in the next sentence.
Therefore, it needs to be revised,
and there is no need to worry about the ABI impact.
Again, Oxford comma of joining entirely independent claues. Can you
filter this via someone / ChatGPT / Google grammar / Outlook grammar?
All the sentences here have been polished by Copilot. I will reorganize
them for better understanding.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
Best Regards,
Yijie
