On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 02:45:21PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Christian Marangi (2025-01-13 14:17:49) > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 01:53:46PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > > Please resubmit the entire patchset. It doesn't compile. > > > > Hope I don't get annoying and sorry for this extra mail. > > No worries. > > > > > I can't repro the compile error, it seems patch 1 of this series wasn't > > applied and changes were tested only with patch 2? > > > > Patch 2 depends on patch 1 as we drop the define. > > > > I applied the first patch, but on top of v6.13-rc1 like all other > patches that don't tell me their base. > > What's the base of the patch series? Please resend with a cover letter > and use --base=<commitish> when formatting the patch series. When I > applied the first patch I got this diffstat > > drivers/clk/clk-en7523.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > so I suspect I'm missing something in clk-fixes for this patch series. > Please call out dependencies in the cover letter. Indeed v6.13-rc1 didn't had the counted_by fix. I referenced the clk-next base branch and sent v6 with the cover letter. Hope it's clear now. -- Ansuel
