On 10/01/2025 14:32, Csókás Bence wrote: > Hi, > > On 2025. 01. 10. 14:00, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> There were other suggested solutions (for instance: just use the >> existing compatible for the On Semi variant) but I figured the most >> common approach is to use a fallback value for 100% compatible models >> and this is what Rob suggested as well. >> >> This reverts the driver change and makes the "onnn,74hc595a" compatible >> use "fairchild,74hc595" as fallback. > > Is there any reason to introduce a new compatible name at all? Does some Yes, DT bindings preference, see writing bindings. I assume of course this is a separate device. You cannot use other compatible "foo" for some other device "bar". Best regards, Krzysztof