Hi,
On 08/01/2025 15:27, Romain Gantois wrote:
Hi Tomi,
On lundi 6 janvier 2025 10:34:10 heure normale d’Europe centrale Tomi
Valkeinen wrote:
Hi,
On 30/12/2024 15:22, Romain Gantois wrote:
...
@@ -1031,17 +1031,17 @@ static int ub960_atr_attach_client(struct i2c_atr
*atr, u32 chan_id,>
struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
unsigned int reg_idx;
- for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_clients);
reg_idx++) { - if (!rxport->aliased_clients[reg_idx])
+ for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < UB960_MAX_PORT_ALIASES; reg_idx++) {
Any reason to drop the use of ARRAY_SIZE()? Usually when dealing with
fixed size arrays, it's nicer to use ARRAY_SIZE().
No reason in particular, I just thought it was more explicit to use ARRAY_SIZE
but I'll keep the UB960_MAX_PORT_ALIASES since you think it's nicer.
You got that the wrong way. The driver uses ARRAY_SIZE, but you change
it to UB960_MAX_PORT_ALIASES...
Tomi
