On 03/01/2025 22:26, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 12:16 PM Vincenzo Frascino
> <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> The Morello architecture is an experimental extension to Armv8.2-A,
>> which extends the AArch64 state with the principles proposed in
>> version 7 of the Capability Hardware Enhanced RISC Instructions
>> (CHERI) ISA.
>>
>> The Morello Platform (soc) and the Fixed Virtual Platfom (fvp) share
>> some functionalities that have conveniently been included in
>> morello.dtsi to avoid duplication.
>
> One more thing...
>
>> + i2c0: i2c@1c0f0000 {
>> + compatible = "cdns,i2c-r1p14";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x1c0f0000 0x0 0x1000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 138 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + clocks = <&dpu_aclk>;
>> +
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +
>> + hdmi_tx: hdmi-transmitter@70 {
>> + compatible = "nxp,tda998x";
>
> It is odd that you add this node here, but don't enable i2c. If this
> is shared with fvp, then enable i2c here. If it isn't, then move this
> to the soc/sdb .dts.
>
This node should be on the dts file. I had it there in v2 and I can't recall the
rationale for which I moved it here. It is clearly wrong. I will move it back in
v5.
> I'd rather see the FVP dts now rather than later so we can review how
> you split things. It's a little odd not being soc.dtsi and board.dts,
> but that's fine I think.
I do not have a complete DTS for FVP yet (I was planning to work on after this
series is merged). Is it OK if I post it with a future series and we move things
around at that stage if there is a need?
>
>> + reg = <0x70>;
>> + video-ports = <0x234501>;
>> + port {
>> + tda998x_0_input: endpoint {
>> + remote-endpoint = <&dp_pl0_out0>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
--
Regards,
Vincenzo
