Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7110-common: replace syscrg clock assignments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Conor  (added CC: Minda Chen, Hal Feng)

On 1/4/25 10:33, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 11:45:07AM -0800, E Shattow wrote:
Replace syscrg assignments of clocks, clock parents, and rates, for
compatibility with downstream boot loader SPL secondary program
loader.

Signed-off-by: E Shattow <e@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi | 12 +++++++++---
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi
index 48fb5091b817..55c6743100a7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-common.dtsi
@@ -359,9 +359,15 @@ spi_dev0: spi@0 {
  };
&syscrg {
-	assigned-clocks = <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_CPU_CORE>,
-			  <&pllclk JH7110_PLLCLK_PLL0_OUT>;
-	assigned-clock-rates = <500000000>, <1500000000>;
+	assigned-clocks = <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_CPU_ROOT>,
+			  <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_BUS_ROOT>,
+			  <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_PERH_ROOT>,
+			  <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_QSPI_REF>;
+	assigned-clock-parents = <&pllclk JH7110_PLLCLK_PLL0_OUT>,
+				 <&pllclk JH7110_PLLCLK_PLL2_OUT>,
+				 <&pllclk JH7110_PLLCLK_PLL2_OUT>,
+				 <&syscrg JH7110_SYSCLK_QSPI_REF_SRC>;
+	assigned-clock-rates = <0>, <0>, <0>, <0>;

Why is assigned rates here 0s, rather than the property just removed?

  };
&sysgpio {
--
2.45.2


Assigned rates all zeroes is how it is in U-Boot. Removing the assigned-clock-rates property as suggested does work in U-Boot and Linux both.

For context, U-Boot fails when replacing assigned-clocks to JH7110_SYSCLK_CPU_CORE (500MHz) and JH7110_PLLCLK_PLL0_OUT (1500MHz) from Linux. So I tried to merge all properties together and in testing then U-Boot failed (or I did it wrong). However replacing the Linux properties with the U-Boot configuration (above) on Linux does work for both.

I do not know if this is correct but I can test any suggestions and report if they are working.

Do these changes make sense? Are there other variations I should test?

Thanks,

-E




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux