Hi Shree, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on broonie-regulator/for-next] [also build test ERROR on next-20241220] [cannot apply to robh/for-next tmlind-omap/for-next linus/master v6.13-rc5] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Shree-Ramamoorthy/regulator-dt-bindings-Add-TI-TPS65215-PMIC-bindings/20250104-070914 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250103230446.197597-3-s-ramamoorthy%40ti.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] regulator: tps65215: Update function & struct names config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-004-20250104 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250104/202501041639.sIGy7REE-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250104/202501041639.sIGy7REE-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501041639.sIGy7REE-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:261:44: error: 'TPS65215_LDO_2' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'TPS65219_LDO_2'? 261 | TPS65219_REGULATOR("LDO2", "ldo2", TPS65215_LDO_2, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:99:43: note: in definition of macro 'TPS65219_REGULATOR' 99 | .id = _id, \ | ^~~ >> drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:263:28: error: 'TPS65215_REG_LDO2_VOUT' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'TPS65219_REG_LDO2_VOUT'? 263 | TPS65215_REG_LDO2_VOUT, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:104:43: note: in definition of macro 'TPS65219_REGULATOR' 104 | .vsel_reg = _vr, \ | ^~~ >> drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:266:28: error: 'TPS65215_ENABLE_LDO2_EN_MASK' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'TPS65219_ENABLE_LDO2_EN_MASK'? 266 | TPS65215_ENABLE_LDO2_EN_MASK, 0, 0, tps65215_ldo_2_range, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:111:43: note: in definition of macro 'TPS65219_REGULATOR' 111 | .enable_mask = _em, \ | ^~~ In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:16, from drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:12: drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c: In function 'tps65219_regulator_probe': drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:328:36: error: 'regulators' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'regulator'? 328 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regulators); i++) { | ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/array_size.h:11:33: note: in definition of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE' 11 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr)) | ^~~ drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:328:36: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in 328 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regulators); i++) { | ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/array_size.h:11:33: note: in definition of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE' 11 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr)) | ^~~ In file included from include/linux/array_size.h:5: include/linux/compiler.h:245:77: error: expression in static assertion is not an integer 245 | #define __BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO_MSG(e, msg) ((int)sizeof(struct {_Static_assert(!(e), msg);})) | ^ include/linux/compiler.h:249:33: note: in expansion of macro '__BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO_MSG' 249 | #define __must_be_array(a) __BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO_MSG(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]), "must be array") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/array_size.h:11:59: note: in expansion of macro '__must_be_array' 11 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:328:25: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE' 328 | for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regulators); i++) { | ^~~~~~~~~~ drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c: At top level: drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:270:36: warning: 'tps65219_regs' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 270 | static const struct regulator_desc tps65219_regs[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:259:36: warning: 'tps65215_regs' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 259 | static const struct regulator_desc tps65215_regs[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:228:36: warning: 'common_regs' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 228 | static const struct regulator_desc common_regs[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~ vim +261 drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c 258 259 static const struct regulator_desc tps65215_regs[] = { 260 // TPS65215's LDO2 is the same as TPS65219's LDO3 > 261 TPS65219_REGULATOR("LDO2", "ldo2", TPS65215_LDO_2, 262 REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, ldos_3_4_ops, 64, > 263 TPS65215_REG_LDO2_VOUT, 264 TPS65219_BUCKS_LDOS_VOUT_VSET_MASK, 265 TPS65219_REG_ENABLE_CTRL, > 266 TPS65215_ENABLE_LDO2_EN_MASK, 0, 0, tps65215_ldo_2_range, 267 3, 0, 0, NULL, 0, 0), 268 }; 269 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
