On 02/01/2025 19:24, Lukas Schmid wrote: > Am 2025-01-02 18:57, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: >> On 02/01/2025 18:49, Lukas Schmid wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Lukas Schmid <lukas.schmid@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml | 2 ++ >> >> You did not read really the messages we gave you... >> >> 1. Read what I wrote in my first reply for v1. I gave detailed >> instruction to avoid the exact mistake you now did. >> >> 2. Read again Andre's reply. >> >> 3. Do not attach (thread) your patchsets to some other threads >> (unrelated or older versions). This buries them deep in the mailbox and >> might interfere with applying entire sets. >> >> 4. Next version, with proper cover letter, is after 24h, so you have >> some time to digest the feedback. >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof > > Hi, > > Thank you for your feedback, and I sincerely apologize for the mistakes > in my submission process. > > I did read Andre's reply and your feedback on v1, but unfortunately, I > had already sent the v2 series as a reply before fully understanding all > the recommendations. I realize now that this was a misstep and caused > confusion. > > I will wait until tomorrow, around 20:00, to send the v3 series. I will > make sure to include a proper cover letter and ensure that all the > feedback from v1 and v2 is addressed. > > Regarding the v1 feedback, I thought I had incorporated all your > suggestions. However, after rereading it, I seem to have missed > something critical. Could you please point out what I might have > overlooked? I want to make sure I fully understand and correct it in the > next iteration. > Please read my full reply for v1 of this patch. How did you implement that feedback - long instruction? Best regards, Krzysztof
