Re: [PATCH 01/38] dt-bindings: clock: add rk3562 cru bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Conor,

On 2024/12/22 22:51, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 06:37:47PM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
Document the device tree bindings of the rockchip rk3562 SoC
clock and reset unit.

Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

  .../bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.yaml   | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..aa8dedf2bfce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/rockchip,rk3562-cru.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Rockchip rk3562 Clock and Reset Control Module
+
+maintainers:
+  - Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+  - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
+
+description:
+  The RK3562 clock controller generates the clock and also implements a reset
+  controller for SoC peripherals. For example it provides SCLK_UART2 and
+  PCLK_UART2, as well as SRST_P_UART2 and SRST_S_UART2 for the second UART
+  module.
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: rockchip,rk3562-cru
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  "#clock-cells":
+    const: 1
+
+  "#reset-cells":
+    const: 1
+
+  clocks:
+    maxItems: 2
+
+  clock-names:
+    items:
+      - const: xin24m
+      - const: xin32k
+
+  rockchip,grf:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
+    description:
+      Phandle to the syscon managing the "general register files" (GRF),
+      if missing pll rates are not changeable, due to the missing pll
+      lock status.
Two questions:
- Why would it ever be missing? Seems like you should make it required.

This may not need for some of SoC, for the rk3562, we don't need it, I will remove it.


Thanks,
- Kever
- Why is it not possible to look the grf up by compatible rather than
   phandle?

Cheers,
Conor.

+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - "#clock-cells"
+  - "#reset-cells"
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    clock-controller@ff100000 {
+      compatible = "rockchip,rk3562-cru";
+      reg = <0xff100000 0x40000>;
+      #clock-cells = <1>;
+      #reset-cells = <1>;
+    };
--
2.25.1






[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux