On 19.12.24 18:42, Frank Li wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 08:25:31AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >> uart1 TX, RX and RTS signals go off the base board and to a RS485 >> transceiver. Describe this in the device tree. > > Look like it is not related what your did in this patch. > > Add uart-has-rtscts in uart1 to ... (because ....) because they go off to the base board to a RS485 transceiver? >> + /* >> + * While there is no CTS line, the property "uart-has-rtscts" is still >> + * the right thing to do to enable the UART to do RS485. In RS485-Mode >> + * CTS isn't used anyhow and there is no dedicated property >> + * "uart-has-rts-but-no-cts". >> + */ >> + uart-has-rtscts; >> }; >> >> &uart2 { >> @@ -618,6 +625,8 @@ pinctrl_uart1: uart1grp { >> MX8MP_IOMUXC_UART1_RXD__UART1_DCE_RX 0x140 >> MX8MP_IOMUXC_UART1_TXD__UART1_DCE_TX 0x140 >> MX8MP_IOMUXC_UART3_RXD__UART1_DTE_RTS 0x140 >> + /* CTS pin is not connected, but needed as workaround */ > > what' means here! what's problem to be workaround? See the more descriptive comment above. We don't actually have CTS connected in hardware, but we mux it anyway, so the i.MX UART is cleared to send always. Thanks, Ahmad > >> + MX8MP_IOMUXC_UART3_TXD__UART1_DTE_CTS 0x140 >> >; >> }; >> >> >> -- >> 2.39.5 >> > -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |