On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 04:11:54PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote: > We can see that: > - as suggested regmap doesn't cause any performance penality. It does > even produce better result. > - the read/set/restore implementation gives worse performance. > > So I guess I will follow the path of regmap + cache page. What do you > think? I'm not seeing results with the "times" variable changed, but in general, I guess the "switch regmap + page" and "switch regmap + phy regmap" will remain neck and neck in terms of performance, surpassing the "switch regmap restore" techniques more and more as "times" increases. So going with a PHY regmap probably sounds good.
