Hi,
On 16/12/2024 10:32, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 08:58:49AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 04:02:59PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The binding is missing maxItems for all renesas,cmms and renesas,vsps
properties. As the amount of cmms or vsps is always a fixed amount, set
the maxItems to match the minItems.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/renesas,du.yaml | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
The top level property should define widest constraints as well.
I'm curious, why is that ? I understand why a top-level default would
make sense when it's optionally overridden by model-specific values, but
in this case there's no such default. Every SoC has its own fixed value.
Looking at the file, shouldn't we have minItems == maxItems for
interrupts and resets too? Well, I guess for interrupts we could in
theory run with just some of the interrupt lines connected. I'm not sure
if that's the case for resets.
Tomi
