On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 09:24:54PM -0600, Shimrra Shai wrote: > It seemed a bit disputed whether this was actually necessary, but I am > including it nonetheless. It makes it slightly clearer how the pins on the > PCA9555 GPIO extender used on the board are actuated than would be evident > from the numbers alone, since according to the spec sheets for it by NXP: > > https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/PCA9555.pdf > > there are two banks of controllable pins, IO0 and IO1, which are labeled > equivalently to the labels provided below. > > Also sorry @Heiko Stübner for adding your name on it; I had cut this off a > BSP source file that was longer. Since this file contains only this > isolated section, which was written by someone else, I put their authorship > on it instead. Unfortunately I do not know who "daijh" is, only that they > used that handle on GitLab to submit this code piece and I got the > indicated email address. > > Signed-off-by: Shimrra Shai <shimrrashai@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip-pca9555.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip-pca9555.h > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip-pca9555.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip-pca9555.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000..21ca99488 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip-pca9555.h > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR MIT */ > +/* > + * Bindings for the PCA9555 GPIO extender used on some Rockchip devices, e.g. > + * Firefly. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Zhongshan Tianqi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. > + * Authors: daijh <djh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + * Shimrra Shai <shimrrashai@xxxxxxxxx> > + */ > + > +#ifndef __ROCKCHIP_PCA9555_H__ > +#define __ROCKCHIP_PCA9555_H__ > + > +#define PCA_IO0_0 0 1. There is no user of these bindings. 2. It's meaningless to map 0 to 0... Drop entire patch. Best regards, Krzysztof