On 13/12/2024 15:50, Ninad Palsule wrote: > From: NINAD PALSULE <ninadpalsule@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Add IPMB device sitting behind PCH module > > Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-system1.dts | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-system1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-system1.dts > index 8f77bc9e860c..51a116d7041a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-system1.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-system1.dts > @@ -763,6 +763,16 @@ i2c3mux0chn7: i2c@7 { > > &i2c4 { > status = "okay"; > + multi-master; > + bus-frequency = <1000000>; > + > + //Set bmc' slave address; Is this relevant/useful comment? Why is it even here? > + bmc_slave@10 { Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification: https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation Also: use DTS coding style (there are no underscores in node names) and use preferred naming scheme (see general kernel coding style / naming). Best regards, Krzysztof