on 11/12/2024 01:50 UTC+09:00, Taewan Kim wrote:
>> From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Adds two watchdog devices for ExynosAutoV920 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>> index c759134c909e..7b9591255e91 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi
>> @@ -183,6 +183,26 @@ cmu_misc: clock-controller@10020000 {
>> "noc";
>> };
>>
>> + watchdog_cl0: watchdog@10060000 {
>
>You need to do careful rebase, not just accept whatever tools shown you.
>
>This is now placed in incorrect order - not keeping sorting by unit address.
I seems to me that the addresses are sorted correctly in order.
Could you kindly check again?
clock-controller@1002_0000
watchdog@1006_0000
watchdog@1007_0000
interrupt-controller@1040_0000
And if there are any rules I might not be aware of, please let me know.
Best regards,
Taewan Kim
