On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 at 19:24, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Document required property for Airoha EN7581 CPUFreq . > > On newer Airoha SoC, CPU Frequency is scaled indirectly with SMCCC commands > to ATF and no clocks are exposed to the OS. > > The SoC have performance state described by ID for each OPP, for this a > Power Domain is used that sets the performance state ID according to the > required OPPs defined in the CPU OPP tables. To clarify this, I would rather speak about a performance-domain with performance-levels, where each level corresponds to a frequency that is controlled by the FW/HW. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes v6: > - No changes > Changes v5: > - Add Reviewed-by tag > - Fix OPP node name error > - Rename cpufreq node name to power-domain > - Rename CPU node power domain name to perf > - Add model and compatible to example > Changes v4: > - Add this patch > > .../cpufreq/airoha,en7581-cpufreq.yaml | 262 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 262 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/airoha,en7581-cpufreq.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/airoha,en7581-cpufreq.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/airoha,en7581-cpufreq.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..7e36fa037e4b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/airoha,en7581-cpufreq.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,262 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/cpufreq/airoha,en7581-cpufreq.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Airoha EN7581 CPUFreq > + > +maintainers: > + - Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> > + > +description: | > + On newer Airoha SoC, CPU Frequency is scaled indirectly with SMCCC commands > + to ATF and no clocks are exposed to the OS. > + > + The SoC have performance state described by ID for each OPP, for this a > + Power Domain is used that sets the performance state ID according to the > + required OPPs defined in the CPU OPP tables. > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: airoha,en7581-cpufreq > + > + '#clock-cells': > + const: 0 I think Rob questioned this too. Why do we need a clock provider here? If this is only to keep the CPUfreq DT driver happy, I think this should be dropped. There is only a performance-domain here, right? > + > + '#power-domain-cells': > + const: 0 > + > + operating-points-v2: true > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - '#clock-cells' > + - '#power-domain-cells' > + - operating-points-v2 > + > +additionalProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + / { > + model = "Airoha EN7581 Evaluation Board"; > + compatible = "airoha,en7581-evb", "airoha,en7581"; > + > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + > + cpus { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + cpu0: cpu@0 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; > + reg = <0x0>; > + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + clocks = <&cpu_pd>; > + clock-names = "cpu"; > + power-domains = <&cpu_pd>; > + power-domain-names = "perf"; > + next-level-cache = <&l2>; > + #cooling-cells = <2>; > + }; > + > + cpu1: cpu@1 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; > + reg = <0x1>; > + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + clocks = <&cpu_pd>; > + clock-names = "cpu"; > + power-domains = <&cpu_pd>; > + power-domain-names = "perf"; > + next-level-cache = <&l2>; > + #cooling-cells = <2>; > + }; > + > + cpu2: cpu@2 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; > + reg = <0x2>; > + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + clocks = <&cpu_pd>; > + clock-names = "cpu"; > + power-domains = <&cpu_pd>; > + power-domain-names = "perf"; > + next-level-cache = <&l2>; > + #cooling-cells = <2>; > + }; > + > + cpu3: cpu@3 { > + device_type = "cpu"; > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a53"; > + reg = <0x3>; > + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>; > + enable-method = "psci"; > + clocks = <&cpu_pd>; > + clock-names = "cpu"; > + power-domains = <&cpu_pd>; > + power-domain-names = "perf"; > + next-level-cache = <&l2>; > + #cooling-cells = <2>; > + }; > + }; > + > + cpu_opp_table: opp-table-cpu { > + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; > + opp-shared; > + > + opp-500000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <500000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp0>; > + }; > + > + opp-550000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <550000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp1>; > + }; > + > + opp-600000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <600000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp2>; > + }; > + > + opp-650000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <650000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp3>; > + }; > + > + opp-7000000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <700000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp4>; > + }; > + > + opp-7500000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <750000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp5>; > + }; > + > + opp-8000000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <800000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp6>; > + }; > + > + opp-8500000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <850000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp7>; > + }; > + > + opp-9000000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <900000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp8>; > + }; > + > + opp-9500000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <950000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp9>; > + }; > + > + opp-10000000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp10>; > + }; > + > + opp-10500000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1050000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp11>; > + }; > + > + opp-11000000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp12>; > + }; > + > + opp-11500000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1150000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp13>; > + }; > + > + opp-12000000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>; > + required-opps = <&smcc_opp14>; > + }; > + }; > + > + cpu_smcc_opp_table: opp-table-smcc { > + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; > + > + smcc_opp0: opp-0 { > + opp-level = <0>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp1: opp-1 { > + opp-level = <1>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp2: opp-2 { > + opp-level = <2>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp3: opp-3 { > + opp-level = <3>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp4: opp-4 { > + opp-level = <4>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp5: opp-5 { > + opp-level = <5>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp6: opp-6 { > + opp-level = <6>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp7: opp-7 { > + opp-level = <7>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp8: opp-8 { > + opp-level = <8>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp9: opp-9 { > + opp-level = <9>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp10: opp-10 { > + opp-level = <10>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp11: opp-11 { > + opp-level = <11>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp12: opp-12 { > + opp-level = <12>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp13: opp-13 { > + opp-level = <13>; > + }; > + > + smcc_opp14: opp-14 { > + opp-level = <14>; > + }; > + }; > + > + cpu_pd: power-domain { Nitpick: We could use the name *performance-domain* here instead, that would make it even more clear what this node describes. > + compatible = "airoha,en7581-cpufreq"; > + > + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_smcc_opp_table>; > + > + #power-domain-cells = <0>; > + #clock-cells = <0>; > + }; > + }; > -- > 2.45.2 > With those changes I am still happy with this approach, so feel free to keep my Reviewed-by tag. Kind regards Uffe