On 04-12-24, 08:04, Christian Marangi wrote: > The idea I prefer this is to save a few CPU cycle and also to prevent > bad usage of the CLK if anyone starts to use it. Returning 0 from a set_rate > would provide bad information. Or your idea was to declare a set_rate > and always return an error like -EINVAL? Returning error is not okay, as it will make opp-set fail eventually. I think we are doing the right thing right now. -- viresh
