On 10/19/2024 1:28 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 15.10.2024 8:26 PM, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote:
>> From: P Praneesh <quic_ppranees@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add register addresses (ath12k_hw_regs) for new ath12k AHB based
>> WiFi device IPQ5332.
>>
>> Tested-on: IPQ5332 hw1.0 AHB WLAN.WBE.1.3.1-00130-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>> Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.1.1-00210-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>
>> Signed-off-by: P Praneesh <quic_ppranees@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Co-developed-by: Balamurugan S <quic_bselvara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Balamurugan S <quic_bselvara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Raj Kumar Bhagat <quic_rajkbhag@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
> [...]
>
>> + /* CE base address */
>> + .hal_umac_ce0_src_reg_base = 0x00740000,
>> + .hal_umac_ce0_dest_reg_base = 0x00741000,
>> + .hal_umac_ce1_src_reg_base = 0x00742000,
>> + .hal_umac_ce1_dest_reg_base = 0x00743000,
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct ath12k_hw_regs wcn7850_regs = {
>> /* SW2TCL(x) R0 ring configuration address */
>> .hal_tcl1_ring_id = 0x00000908,
>> @@ -1126,7 +1210,7 @@ static const struct ath12k_hw_params ath12k_hw_params[] = {
>> .internal_sleep_clock = false,
>>
>> .hw_ops = &qcn9274_ops,
>> - .regs = NULL,
>> + .regs = &ipq5332_regs,
>
> This makes me believe the patches should be reordered (or perhaps
> this should be squashed with "add ath12k_hw_params for IPQ5332"?)
>
Sure, in next version we will squash patch[2/22] to patch[8/22] into single patch that will add the complete hardware parameters.
