On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:35 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Il 26/11/24 11:36, Wojciech Macek ha scritto:
> > Add support for Starmie Chromebooks.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wojciech Macek <wmacek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changelog v3-v2:
> > - Cleaned up DTS
> > - Re-using dsi_out node
> > - Removed unnecessary delete-nodes
> > - Moved touchpads to per-board dts
> > - Modified 3.3/6V power regulator node
> > Changelog v2-v1:
> > - No changes
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/Makefile | 2 +
> > .../mediatek/mt8186-corsola-starmie-sku0.dts | 31 ++
> > .../mediatek/mt8186-corsola-starmie-sku1.dts | 31 ++
> > .../dts/mediatek/mt8186-corsola-starmie.dtsi | 465 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 529 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186-corsola-starmie-sku0.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186-corsola-starmie-sku1.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186-corsola-starmie.dtsi
> >
>
> ..snip..
> > +/*
> > + * Battery on Starmie is using a different address than default.
> > + */
> > +&battery {
>
> I didn't ask you to do it this way, and that was for a good reason.
>
> Besides, you haven't run dtbs_check before sending this.
> Give it a go and you'll see why.
>
> Regards,
> Angelo
I'll update patches tomorrow once I get my Starmie back.
Meanwhile, to limit unnecessary turnarounds, I think I'd like to leave
the /delete-node/ for battery. In case status=disabled is used we
still would end up with the "battery" alias pointing to the old node.
That might be very misleading if someone ever tries to access battery
node using &battery link. Something like below.
/*
* Battery on Starmie is using a different address than default.
* Remove old node to avoid "battery" alias pointing to disabled
* node.
*/
/delete-node/ &battery;
&i2c_tunnel {
battery: sbs-battery@f {
compatible = "sbs,sbs-battery";
reg = <0xf>;
sbs,i2c-retry-count = <2>;
sbs,poll-retry-count = <1>;
};
};
Please let me know if you're OK with that.
Thanks,
Wojtek
>
> > + reg = <0xf>;
> > +};
>
