On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 09:05:05AM +0100, Howard Chen wrote:
> This patch adds an idle-states node to describe the mt8173 idle states and
> also adds references to the idle-states node in all CPU nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Howard Chen <howard.chen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Is copying me in too much effort to ask ?
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
> index 8554ec3..0d31a34 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
> @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@
> device_type = "cpu";
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
> reg = <0x000>;
> + enable-method = "psci";
> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
Cluster idle state vanished between v1 and v2.
?
> };
>
> cpu1: cpu@1 {
> @@ -55,6 +57,7 @@
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a53";
> reg = <0x001>;
> enable-method = "psci";
> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> };
>
> cpu2: cpu@100 {
> @@ -62,6 +65,7 @@
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
> reg = <0x100>;
> enable-method = "psci";
> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> };
>
> cpu3: cpu@101 {
> @@ -69,6 +73,19 @@
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a57";
> reg = <0x101>;
> enable-method = "psci";
> + cpu-idle-states = <&CPU_SLEEP_0>;
> + };
> +
> + idle-states {
> + entry-method = "arm,psci";
> +
> + CPU_SLEEP_0: cpu-sleep-0 {
> + compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x0010000>;
> + entry-latency-us = <639>;
> + exit-latency-us = <328>;
> + min-residency-us = <1088>;
> + };
> };
> };
Is the arch timer still running when you enter this state ?
Apart from these remarks the patch seems fine, I wonder whether we should
merge these changes into the kernel instead of keeping these changes in
firmware for specific kernel configurations.
Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
