Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] DT: leds: Improve description of flash LEDs related properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Hi!

> > I think that a board designed so that it can be damaged because of
> > software bugs should be considered not eligible for commercial
> > use.

Hello? It is 2015. Yes, that was nice rule... in 1995 or so :-).

> > As I mentioned in the previous message in this subject, the max-microamp
> > property refers also to non-flash LEDs. Since existing LED class devices
> > does not require them, then it should be left optional and default to
> > max. It would however be inconsistent with flash LEDs related
> > properties.

For non-flash LEDs and backward compatibility, I guess you are
right. Inconsistency is fine in this case...
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux