On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 5:48 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Il 24/11/24 17:59, Sasha Levin ha scritto: > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 05:47:33PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 24/11/2024 17:29, Sasha Levin wrote: > >>> Hi Rob, > >>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:07:30PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > >>>> of: WARN on deprecated #address-cells/#size-cells handling > >>> > >>> With the commit above, I've started seeing boot warnings on a few > >> > >> And same boards do not report problems on the next? > > > > Looks like they do. I haven't checked it previously, but I see that we > > have similar warnings on a few boards that KernelCI is testing -next on. > > > > That's... horrendous. > > I hope that we can get a proper fix with a bootloader update on these (now very > old) devices... Adding a Google engineer to the loop so that he can follow up > internally. AFAIK that's unlikely going to happen given the resources needed from the ODMs for a firmware re-qualification. Or we would have fixed the GIC bug in ATF and had pseudo-NMI. Some of the firmware code involved is 10 years old, so even the RK3399 Chromebooks, which no longer have support, could suffer from this as well. > The alternative would be to hack-in a firmware node to mt8183-kukui.dtsi, but.... > ...ugh. That'd be indeed a hack for the sole purpose of fixing a bootloader that > is acting in a broken way, and I don't like that at all (...and I'm sure I'm not > alone!). Regards ChenYu
