Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: sun5i: Enable touchscreen on Utoo P66

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 03:21:41PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 04-04-15 14:44, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >Hi Hans,
> >
> >On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:29:37PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Add a node for the chipone-icn8318 touchscreen found on the Utoo P66 tablet.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >>Changes in v2:
> >>-Fix touchscreen node name
> >>---
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-utoo-p66.dts | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-utoo-p66.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-utoo-p66.dts
> >>index 9108ecd..00bdf28 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-utoo-p66.dts
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun5i-a13-utoo-p66.dts
> >>@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> >>  #include "sunxi-common-regulators.dtsi"
> >>  #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> >>  #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
> >>+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >>  #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/sun4i-a10.h>
> >>
> >>  / {
> >>@@ -93,6 +94,20 @@
> >>  	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c1_pins_a>;
> >>  	status = "okay";
> >>
> >>+	icn8318: touchscreen@40 {
> >>+		compatible = "chipone,icn8318";
> >>+		reg = <0x40>;
> >>+		interrupt-parent = <&pio>;
> >>+		interrupts = <9 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>; /* EINT9 (PG9) */
> >
> >I don't think you sent a reply to this comment, but this should really
> >be in a pinctrl node so that no one else can request the pin and
> >change its muxing and it shows up in debugfs.
> 
> I did reply to that comment on v1 of this patch:
> 
> """
> That is not necessary when specifying a gpio interrupt through the
> irq chip (rather then through a gpios property), the mux is automatically
> set to irq by the kernel when requesting the irq.
> 
> Also note that we must use the interrupts notation here as this is specified
> by the i2c client bindings. None of the other boards using i2c + oob irq
> pins specifies a pinmux for the irq pin either.
> """

I never received that mail, I guess we can blame Google Groups for
that.

> I've just double checked and I cannot (quickly) find any existing
> devicetree files using interrupts = <foo> combined with pinctrl for
> i2c clients.
> 
> If you look in e.g. arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-trats.dts and
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts you will see the same
> pattern of using interrupts = <foo> pointing to a gpio without using
> pinctrl
> 
> And we already to the same for sdio oob interrupts in
> sun7i-a20-cubietruck.dts and
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun7i-a20-i12-tvbox.dts, so I vote for being
> consistent here and not using pinctrl for the irq pin here either.

That might turn out to be an issue, but ok.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux