Re: simple framebuffer slower by factor of 20, on socfpga (arm) platform

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tuesday, April 07, 2015 at 02:19:33 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > I have an socfpga board, which uses has simple framebuffer implemented
> > in the FPGA. On 3.15, framebuffer is fast:
> > 
> > root@wagabuibui:~# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
> > real               0m 0.00s
> > user               0m 0.00s
> > sys                0m 0.00s
> > 
> > on 3.18, this takes 220msec. Similar slowdown exists for
> > writes. Simple framebuffer did not change at all between 3.15 and
> > 3.18; resource flags of the framebuffer are still same (0x200).
> > 
> > If I enable caching on 3.18, it speeds up a bit, to 70msec or
> > so... Which means problem is not only in caching.
> > 
> > Any ideas?
> 
> My first guess was  commit 67dc0d4758e5 ("vt_buffer: drop console buffer
> copying optimisations"), but this was introduced only in v4.0-rc1.
> 
> Just in case you encounter another performance regression after upgrading
> to a more modern kernel ;-)

Why don't you use the Altera VIP FB on SoCFPGA ?

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux