Hi Oreoluwa, On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 1:45 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 10:06 PM Oreoluwa Babatunde > <quic_obabatun@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/29/2024 5:41 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2024 at 12:08 AM Oreoluwa Babatunde > > > <quic_obabatun@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Reserved memory regions defined in the devicetree can be broken up into > > >> two groups: > > >> i) Statically-placed reserved memory regions > > >> i.e. regions defined with a static start address and size using the > > >> "reg" property. > > >> ii) Dynamically-placed reserved memory regions. > > >> i.e. regions defined by specifying an address range where they can be > > >> placed in memory using the "alloc_ranges" and "size" properties. [...] > > >> Signed-off-by: Oreoluwa Babatunde <quic_obabatun@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 8a6e02d0c00e7b62 > > > ("of: reserved_mem: Restructure how the reserved memory regions > > > are processed") in dt-rh/for-next. > > > > > > I have bisected a boot issue on RZ/Five to this commit. > > > With "earlycon keep_bootcon" (else there is no output): > > > > > > Oops - store (or AMO) access fault [#1] > > > CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted > > > 6.12.0-rc1-00015-g8a6e02d0c00e #201 > > > Hardware name: Renesas SMARC EVK based on r9a07g043f01 (DT) > > > epc : __memset+0x60/0x100 > > > ra : __dma_alloc_from_coherent+0x150/0x17a > > > epc : ffffffff8062d2bc ra : ffffffff80053a94 sp : ffffffc60000ba20 > > > gp : ffffffff812e9938 tp : ffffffd601920000 t0 : ffffffc6000d0000 > > > t1 : 0000000000000000 t2 : ffffffffe9600000 s0 : ffffffc60000baa0 > > > s1 : ffffffc6000d0000 a0 : ffffffc6000d0000 a1 : 0000000000000000 > > > a2 : 0000000000001000 a3 : ffffffc6000d1000 a4 : 0000000000000000 > > > a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : ffffffd601adacc0 a7 : ffffffd601a841a8 > > > s2 : ffffffd6018573c0 s3 : 0000000000001000 s4 : ffffffd6019541e0 > > > s5 : 0000000200000022 s6 : ffffffd6018f8410 s7 : ffffffd6018573e8 > > > s8 : 0000000000000001 s9 : 0000000000000001 s10: 0000000000000010 > > > s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4 : ffffffffdefe62d1 > > > t5 : 000000001cd6a3a9 t6 : ffffffd601b2aad6 > > > status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: ffffffc6000d0000 cause: 0000000000000007 > > > [<ffffffff8062d2bc>] __memset+0x60/0x100 > > > [<ffffffff80053e1a>] dma_alloc_from_global_coherent+0x1c/0x28 > > > [<ffffffff80053056>] dma_direct_alloc+0x98/0x112 > > > [<ffffffff8005238c>] dma_alloc_attrs+0x78/0x86 > > > [<ffffffff8035fdb4>] rz_dmac_probe+0x3f6/0x50a > > Please can you provide reproduction steps? I tried booting up > > risc-v arch with qemu but did not run into the issue you are > > seeing. > > It indeed doesn't happen on other RISC-V platforms (tried MPFS/Icicle). > RZ/Five is special in that it is DMA non-coherent, and the crash > happens in dma_alloc_from_global_coherent(). > According to the logs, the DMA pool at 0x58000000 is still being created. > I'll try to debug this further next week... I found the issue, and have sent a fix https://lore.kernel.org/r/f8cef6845a6141f0277e31a71fe153612daae776.1731436631.git.geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds