On Mon, 11 Nov 2024, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 06 Nov 2024, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:00 PM Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 06 Nov 2024, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 06, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 01:20:04 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > > > > Add support for Airoha EN7581 GPIO System Controller which provide a > > > > > > register map for controlling the GPIO, pinctrl and PWM of the SoC via > > > > > > dedicated pinctrl and pwm child nodes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > > > > > > > [4/6] dt-bindings: mfd: Add support for Airoha EN7581 GPIO System Controller > > > > > commit: f49f37f3cfe1482d4dc77d26f3e8c38eab630d52 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Lee Jones [李琼斯] > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > > > > > according to my understanding this patch has been already applied by Linus > > > > here: > > > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/commit/?h=devel&id=50dedb1eb1e6755ccab55f6140916c2d192be765 > > > > > > An interesting choice. Linus? > > > > Yes I suggested that I merge patches 1-5 on oct 29 and applied the > > day after: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/CACRpkdYshPusdA7bDW2y8H_wp-Fm3N-YCsY1_Qn=dZqRiFy12w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > It's because the bindings are dependent on each other, this one patch has: > > > > + pinctrl: > > + type: object > > + $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/airoha,en7581-pinctrl.yaml > > + description: > > + Child node definition for EN7581 Pin controller > > + > > + pwm: > > + type: object > > + $ref: /schemas/pwm/airoha,en7581-pwm.yaml > > + description: > > + Child node definition for EN7581 PWM controller > > > > Those refs will explode unless the two others are merged at the same > > time. > > > > Usually we merge the whole shebang through MFD but this one felt > > different because there is no actual MFD driver, just using simple-mfd. > > > > In hindsight I should probs not have been so trigger happy and give > > some more time for this to settle... Merge window stress I guess. :/ > > > > It's fine to apply textually identical patches to two trees though as > > git will sort > > that out so technically it's no big deal, you can keep it applied if you > > want. > > It's okay. Life will be easier for everyone if I remove it. Okay, I dropped it from my tree. Next time I would like a say/opportunity to Ack please. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]
