[+cc Ben, linuxppc-dev, Grant, Rob, devicetree]
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:57:48PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Found "no compatible bridge window" warning in boot log from T5-8.
>
> pci 0000:00:01.0: can't claim BAR 15 [mem 0x100000000-0x4afffffff pref]: no compatible bridge window
>
> That resource is above 4G, but does not get offset correctly as
> root bus only report io and mem32.
>
> pci_sun4v f02dbcfc: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x804000000000-0x80400fffffff] (bus address [0x0000-0xfffffff])
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x800000000000-0x80007effffff] (bus address [0x00000000-0x7effffff])
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-77]
>
> Add mem64 handling in pci_common for sparc, so we can have 64bit resource
> registered for root bus at first.
>
> After patch, will have:
> pci_sun4v f02dbcfc: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x804000000000-0x80400fffffff] (bus address [0x0000-0xfffffff])
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x800000000000-0x80007effffff] (bus address [0x00000000-0x7effffff])
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x800100000000-0x8007ffffffff] (bus address [0x100000000-0x7ffffffff])
> pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00-77]
>
> Fixes: commit d63e2e1f3df9 ("sparc/PCI: Clip bridge windows to fit in upstream windows")
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQU1gJY1LYrxs+ma5LCTEEe4xmtjRG0aXJ9K_Tsu+m9Wuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> #3.19
> ---
> arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c | 7 ++++++-
> arch/sparc/kernel/pci_common.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> arch/sparc/kernel/pci_impl.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> index 9ce5afe..04ce3ac 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -185,8 +185,10 @@ static unsigned long pci_parse_of_flags(u32 addr0)
>
> if (addr0 & 0x02000000) {
> flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_MEMORY;
> - flags |= (addr0 >> 22) & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
> flags |= (addr0 >> 28) & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_1M;
> + if (addr0 & 0x01000000)
> + flags |= IORESOURCE_MEM_64
> + | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64;
> if (addr0 & 0x40000000)
> flags |= IORESOURCE_PREFETCH
> | PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_PREFETCH;
This function is very similar to these:
drivers/of/address.c of_bus_pci_get_flags()
arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_of_scan.c pci_parse_of_flags()
arch/sparc/kernel/of_device_32.c of_bus_pci_get_flags()
arch/sparc/kernel/of_device_64.c of_bus_pci_get_flags()
Should they get a similar change? They're all so similar that it would be
nice to consolidate them, but I think that would be out of scope for this
patch.
> @@ -663,6 +665,9 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
> pbm->io_space.start);
> pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &pbm->mem_space,
> pbm->mem_space.start);
> + if (pbm->mem64_space.flags)
> + pci_add_resource_offset(&resources, &pbm->mem64_space,
> + pbm->mem_space.start);
> pbm->busn.start = pbm->pci_first_busno;
> pbm->busn.end = pbm->pci_last_busno;
> pbm->busn.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_common.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_common.c
> index 944a065..a859a86 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_common.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_common.c
> @@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ void pci_determine_mem_io_space(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
> }
>
> num_pbm_ranges = i / sizeof(*pbm_ranges);
> + memset(&pbm->mem64_space, 0, sizeof(struct resource));
>
> for (i = 0; i < num_pbm_ranges; i++) {
> const struct linux_prom_pci_ranges *pr = &pbm_ranges[i];
> @@ -451,7 +452,11 @@ void pci_determine_mem_io_space(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
> break;
>
> case 3:
> - /* XXX 64-bit MEM handling XXX */
> + /* 64-bit MEM handling */
> + pbm->mem64_space.start = a;
> + pbm->mem64_space.end = a + size - 1UL;
> + pbm->mem64_space.flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> + break;
>
> default:
> break;
> @@ -465,15 +470,21 @@ void pci_determine_mem_io_space(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
> prom_halt();
> }
>
> - printk("%s: PCI IO[%llx] MEM[%llx]\n",
> + printk("%s: PCI IO[%llx] MEM[%llx]",
> pbm->name,
> pbm->io_space.start,
> pbm->mem_space.start);
> + if (pbm->mem64_space.flags)
> + printk(" MEM64[%llx]",
> + pbm->mem64_space.start);
> + printk("\n");
>
> pbm->io_space.name = pbm->mem_space.name = pbm->name;
>
> request_resource(&ioport_resource, &pbm->io_space);
> request_resource(&iomem_resource, &pbm->mem_space);
> + if (pbm->mem64_space.flags)
> + request_resource(&iomem_resource, &pbm->mem64_space);
>
> pci_register_legacy_regions(&pbm->io_space,
> &pbm->mem_space);
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_impl.h b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_impl.h
> index 75803c7..37222ca 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_impl.h
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci_impl.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct pci_pbm_info {
> /* PBM I/O and Memory space resources. */
> struct resource io_space;
> struct resource mem_space;
> + struct resource mem64_space;
> struct resource busn;
>
> /* Base of PCI Config space, can be per-PBM or shared. */
> --
> 1.8.4.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
