On 15:03-20241108, Roger Quadros wrote: > >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/ti,mux-clock.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/ti,mux-clock.yaml > >>> new file mode 100644 > >>> index 000000000000..b271ab86dde1 > >>> --- /dev/null > >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/ti,mux-clock.yaml > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ > >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > >> > >> Surely TI as the only author of the original binding would agree to > >> dual-license this? > >> > > So there is a question mark. So you are waiting for some confirmation > > form TI? > > TI code uses below license clause. So better to stick to that. > > # SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) Just my 2 cents: Just to be clear, as a corporate, as TI contributor we have approval for the following two: For new stuff: GPL-2.0-only OR MIT for legacy stuff, we had GPL-2.0-only. There are indeed instances of community contributions with GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause, but that is definitely something community is free to do. Looking at history of Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ti/mux.txt, I believe, at least from TI perspective, we are fine with GPL-2.0-only OR MIT and I think it will let other s/w ecosystems consume the same as well. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
