Am Donnerstag, 7. November 2024, 13:49:50 CET schrieb Alexander Stein:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..a9f4c1fe61cc
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2024 NXP
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "imx91-pinfunc.h"
> > +#include "imx93.dtsi"
> > +
> > +&{/thermal-zones/cpu-thermal/cooling-maps/map0} {
> > + cooling-device =
> > + <&A55_0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&clk {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx91-ccm";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&eqos {
> > + clocks = <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET1_QOS_TSN_GATE>,
> > + <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET1_QOS_TSN_GATE>,
> > + <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET_TIMER>,
> > + <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET1_QOS_TSN>,
> > + <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET1_QOS_TSN_GATE>;
> > + assigned-clocks = <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET_TIMER>,
> > + <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET1_QOS_TSN>;
> > + assigned-clock-parents = <&clk IMX93_CLK_SYS_PLL_PFD1_DIV2>,
> > + <&clk IMX93_CLK_SYS_PLL_PFD0_DIV2>;
>
> Is it just me or is the alignment of new lines not matching?
>
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +&fec {
> > + clocks = <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET2_REGULAR_GATE>,
> > + <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET2_REGULAR_GATE>,
> > + <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET_TIMER>,
> > + <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET2_REGULAR>,
> > + <&clk IMX93_CLK_DUMMY>;
> > + assigned-clocks = <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET_TIMER>,
> > + <&clk IMX91_CLK_ENET2_REGULAR>;
> > + assigned-clock-parents = <&clk IMX93_CLK_SYS_PLL_PFD1_DIV2>,
> > + <&clk IMX93_CLK_SYS_PLL_PFD0_DIV2>;
>
> Here as well: Is it just me or is the alignment of new lines not matching?
>
> > + assigned-clock-rates = <100000000>, <250000000>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&i3c1 {
> > + clocks = <&clk IMX93_CLK_BUS_AON>,
> > + <&clk IMX93_CLK_I3C1_GATE>,
> > + <&clk IMX93_CLK_DUMMY>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&i3c2 {
> > + clocks = <&clk IMX93_CLK_BUS_WAKEUP>,
> > + <&clk IMX93_CLK_I3C2_GATE>,
> > + <&clk IMX93_CLK_DUMMY>;
> > +};
> > +
> > +&tmu {
> > + status = "disabled";
>
> Why does the TMU needs to be disabled instead of deleted?
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* i.MX91 only has one A core */
> > +/delete-node/ &A55_1;
> > +
> > +/* i.MX91 not has cm33 */
> > +/delete-node/ &cm33;
> > +
> > +/* i.MX91 not has power-domain@44461800 */
> > +/delete-node/ &mlmix;
> >
>
> Shouldn't the following node also be removed?
> * mipi_csi
> * dsi
> * lvds_bridge
> * lcdif_to_dsi
> * lcdif_to_ldb
Add mu1 and mu2 to that list.
Best regards,
Alexander
--
TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany
Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018
Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider
http://www.tq-group.com/
