Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] regulator: Introduce property to flag drms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 1:54 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 03:55:43PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> Introduce "regulator-allow-drms" to make it possible for board
>> configuration to enable drms for regulators.
>
> I don't think this is a good name, nobody unfamiliar with a fairly
> obscure feature in the Linux regulator API is going to know what DRMS
> means.  Something like change-load might be clearer.

Right. And with the cleanup of the drms handling (drms_uA_update())
that we discussed during ELC it makes more sense for the Linux case as
well. I will rework this patch and include it when sending out the
cleanup.

Would you mind picking the other patches from this series or do you
want me to resend them? They are unrelated to this issue and will give
us working regulators (without set_load support) on the affected
platforms.

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux