Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: phy: Add Rockchip MIPI CSI/DSI PHY schema

["Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On Mon Nov 4, 2024 at 12:11 PM CET, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add dt-binding schema for the MIPI CSI/DSI PHY found on
> Rockchip RK3588 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml       | 82 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5ee8d7246fa0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/phy/rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Rockchip MIPI CSI/DSI PHY with Samsung IP block
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Guochun Huang <hero.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> +  - Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - rockchip,rk3576-mipi-dcphy
> +      - rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  "#phy-cells":
> +    const: 0
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 2
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: pclk
> +      - const: ref
> +
> +  resets:
> +    maxItems: 4
> +
> +  reset-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: m_phy
> +      - const: apb
> +      - const: grf
> +      - const: s_phy
> +
> +  rockchip,grf:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> +    description:
> +      Phandle to the syscon managing the 'mipi dcphy general register files'.

Should this dt-binding have a power-domains property?
RK3588 TRM v1.0 part 1 page 1097 has ALIVE(PD_BUS) for
MIPI_DC_PHY0~MIPI_DC_PHY1

FTR: I made a similar remark on another patch sent by Heiko today. While
that was incorrect, I do think it's appropriate for this binding after
which it could also be added to the respective phy nodes in the dts(i)
file(s).

Cheers,
  Diederik

> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - clocks
> +  - clock-names
> +  - resets
> +  - reset-names
> +  - "#phy-cells"
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/reset/rockchip,rk3588-cru.h>
> +
> +    soc {
> +      #address-cells = <2>;
> +      #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +      phy@feda0000 {
> +        compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-mipi-dcphy";
> +        reg = <0x0 0xfeda0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> +        clocks = <&cru PCLK_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> +                 <&cru CLK_USBDPPHY_MIPIDCPPHY_REF>;
> +        clock-names = "pclk", "ref";
> +        resets = <&cru SRST_M_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> +                 <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DCPHY0>,
> +                 <&cru SRST_P_MIPI_DCPHY0_GRF>,
> +                 <&cru SRST_S_MIPI_DCPHY0>;
> +        reset-names = "m_phy", "apb", "grf", "s_phy";
> +        rockchip,grf = <&mipidcphy0_grf>;
> +        #phy-cells = <0>;
> +      };
> +    };

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature