Hello Dimitri, On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 08:07:09PM +0100, Dimitri Fedrau wrote: > Am Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 11:19:16PM +0200 schrieb Uwe Kleine-König: > > What breaks if you drop the check for state->enabled? > > > The device is unable to generate a 0% duty cycle, to support this you > proposed in an earlier review to disable the output. Without checking if > the output is disabled, the mc33xs2410_pwm_get_state function returns the > wrong duty cycle for a previously setted 0% duty cycle. A "0" value in the > MC33XS2410_PWM_DC register means that the relative duty cylce is 1/256. As > a result there are complaints if PWM_DEBUG is enabled. I fail to follow. If .enabled=true + .duty_cycle=0 is requested you disable. That's fine. However it shouldn't be necessary to use state->enabled in .get_state(). I didn't look at the actual code, but if you provide a sequence of writes to /sys that trigger a PWM_DEBUG output, I'll take another look. Best regards Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature