On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 6:04 PM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 20:23:26 +0000, Lothar Rubusch wrote: > > Add device-tree support for the following SoMs: > > > > - Mercury SA1 (cyclone5) > > - Mercury+ SA2 (cyclone5) > > - Mercury+ AA1 (arria10) > > [...] > My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this > series. > > Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings > are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform > maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply > unless the platform maintainer has comments. [answering to this bot] None of the "platform maintainers" gave me feedback so far. My intention is just to upstream the mentioned .dts and .dtsi files. I checked my files and fixed my obvious bindings mistakes. But, bindings for platform socfpga are still described in (old) TXT files, not in YAML. So, do you want me to write the .yaml files, too? Or, are my files acceptable by "the platform maintainer"? What is missing here? Should I try to fix every error of Rob's bot? Are the boards / is the platform too old and you don't want them anymore? I'm not complaining here, I may try, but I would like to know what's missing. Please, - Rob, Connor or Krzysztof - can you give me feedback and tell me what you guys expect me to do now here? Thanks in advance! > If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then [...]
