On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 1:57 PM Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 7:48 PM Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > One option is to define a trait for integers: Yeah, but that doesn't feel like something I should do here. I imagine other things might need the same thing. Perhaps the bindings for readb/readw/readl for example. And essentially the crate:num already has the trait I need. Shouldn't the kernel mirror that? I recall seeing some topic of including crates in the kernel? > +1, one more thing to consider is whether it makes sense to define a > DT-only trait that holds all the types that can be a device property > (like `bool` too, not just the `Integer`s). > > Then we can avoid e.g. `property_read_bool` and simply do it in `property_read`. Is there no way to say must have traitA or traitB? Rob
