Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-j784s4: Mark tps659413 regulators as bootph-all

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andrew,

On 09:56-20241010, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 12:14:50PM GMT, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> > This series marks tps659413's regulators as bootph-all in order for
> > the nodes (and parent nodes) to be accessible during MCU's u-boot SPL.
> > 
> > This in turn is desired since the tps659413 needs its MCU ESM
> > state machine setup in order for the watchdog to reset the board.
> > 
> > This took me a little while to track down, as enabling the ESM, TPS6594,
> > etc in u-boot would result in the below boot failure:
> > 
> >     U-Boot SPL 2024.10-rc4-00007-g44b12cbcd1b3-dirty (Sep 06 2024 - 14:25:52 -0500)
> >     SYSFW ABI: 3.1 (firmware rev 0x0009 '9.2.4--v09.02.04 (Kool Koala)')
> >     Initialized 4 DRAM controllers
> >     SPL initial stack usage: 13408 bytes
> >     ### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###
> > 
> > Which turns out to actually have failed far earlier in spl_early_init(),
> > due to these nodes not being accessible in u-boot. That's hard to tell
> > though since console isn't setup until later (and for that reason I
> > think spl_early_init()'s return value in j784s4_init.c isn't
> > evaluated since a panic() at that point would leave a user with *no*
> > information at all).
> > 
> > I've tested this in conjunction with a u-boot series which I'll link in
> > a follow-up response on the k3-j784s4-evm. I'd appreciate someone testing
> > on the k3-am69-sk at a minimum, as it should suffer the same fate if things
> > aren't setup appropriately.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Added Udit's Tested-by tags
> > - Reordered bootph-all to align with dts-coding-style (Beleswar)
> > - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240911-j784s4-tps6594-bootph-v2-0-a83526264ab1@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> This applies fine still on linux-next, any chance this could be picked
> up?

You might've to re-spin the series, I saw that [0] got merged and you
might've to put j784s4 related changes in k3-j784s4-j742s2-evm-common.dtsi
now instead.

Regards,
Manorit

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240902-b4-upstream-j742s2-v6-0-6a7aa2736797@xxxxxx/
> 
> The associated[0] u-boot change is dependent on this and it would be
> nice to get the wdog working on mainline u-boot + linux.
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3bf2177d-178f-46bf-abfe-6f00a52c623b@xxxxxx/
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux