Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] rust: Add bindings for device properties

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 4:12 PM Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 5:06 PM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The device property API is a firmware agnostic API for reading
> > properties from firmware (DT/ACPI) devices nodes and swnodes.
> >
> > While the C API takes a pointer to a caller allocated variable/buffer,
> > the rust API is designed to return a value and can be used in struct
> > initialization. Rust generics are also utilized to support different
> > sizes of properties (e.g. u8, u16, u32).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Not sure if we need the KVec variant, but I kept it as that was my first
> > pass attempt. Most callers are filling in some value in a driver data
> > struct. Sometimes the number of elements is not known, so the caller
> > calls to get the array size, allocs the correct size buffer, and then
> > reads the property again to fill in the buffer.
> >
> > I have not implemented a wrapper for device_property_read_string(_array)
> > because that API is problematic for dynamic DT nodes. The API just
> > returns pointer(s) into the raw DT data. We probably need to return a
> > copy of the string(s) instead for rust.
> >
> > After property accessors, next up is child node accessors/iterators.
> > ---
> >  rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h |   1 +
> >  rust/kernel/device.rs           | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> > index 217c776615b9..65717cc20a23 100644
> > --- a/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> > +++ b/rust/bindings/bindings_helper.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>
> >  #include <linux/phy.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/property.h>
> >  #include <linux/refcount.h>
> >  #include <linux/sched.h>
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> > diff --git a/rust/kernel/device.rs b/rust/kernel/device.rs
> > index 0c28b1e6b004..bb66a28df890 100644
> > --- a/rust/kernel/device.rs
> > +++ b/rust/kernel/device.rs
> > @@ -5,10 +5,14 @@
> >  //! C header: [`include/linux/device.h`](srctree/include/linux/device.h)
> >
> >  use crate::{
> > +    alloc::KVec,
> >      bindings,
> > +    error::{to_result, Result},
> > +    prelude::*,
> > +    str::CStr,
> >      types::{ARef, Opaque},
> >  };
> > -use core::{fmt, ptr};
> > +use core::{fmt, mem::size_of, ptr};
> >
> >  #[cfg(CONFIG_PRINTK)]
> >  use crate::c_str;
> > @@ -189,6 +193,145 @@ unsafe fn printk(&self, klevel: &[u8], msg: fmt::Arguments<'_>) {
> >              )
> >          };
> >      }
> > +
> > +    /// Returns if a firmware property `name` is true or false
> > +    pub fn property_read_bool(&self, name: &CStr) -> bool {
> > +        unsafe { bindings::device_property_present(self.as_raw(), name.as_ptr() as *const i8) }
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /// Returns if a firmware string property `name` has match for `match_str`
> > +    pub fn property_match_string(&self, name: &CStr, match_str: &CStr) -> Result<usize> {
> > +        let ret = unsafe {
> > +            bindings::device_property_match_string(
> > +                self.as_raw(),
> > +                name.as_ptr() as *const i8,
> > +                match_str.as_ptr() as *const i8,
> > +            )
> > +        };
> > +        to_result(ret)?;
> > +        Ok(ret as usize)
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    /// Returns firmware property `name` scalar value
> > +    ///
> > +    /// Valid types are i8, u8, i16, u16, i32, u32, i64, u64
> > +    pub fn property_read<T: Copy>(&self, name: &CStr) -> Result<T> {
> > +        let mut val: [T; 1] = unsafe { core::mem::zeroed() };
> > +
> > +        Self::_property_read_array(&self, name, &mut val)?;
> > +        Ok(val[0])
> > +    }
> > +
>
> This, and several of the other methods are unsound, because they can
> be used to construct arbitrary types for which may not allow all bit
> patterns. You can use:
> https://rust.docs.kernel.org/kernel/types/trait.FromBytes.html as the
> bound to ensure only valid types are used.
>
> Also, instead of using mem::zeroed(), you should use MaybeUnininit
> (https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/core/mem/union.MaybeUninit.html)
> which allows you to avoid needing to zero initialize.

Something like this what you had in mind?:

pub fn property_read_array<T, const N: usize>(&self, name: &CStr) ->
Result<[T; N]> {
    let mut val: [MaybeUninit<T>; N] = [const { MaybeUninit::uninit() }; N];

    Self::_property_read_array(self, name, &mut val)?;

    // SAFETY: On success, _property_read_array has filled in the array
    let val = unsafe { mem::transmute_copy(&val) };
    Ok(val)
}





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux